Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preliminary selection of bracing systems in high-rise steel buildings requires comparing many configurations, each demanding computationally intensive minimum-weight design. This study uses machine learning to estimate the best-observed feasible weight directly from building-level configuration parameters. A full factorial dataset of 45 configurations covered three storey numbers (17, 24, and 30), three bracing types (V, X, and K), and five brace-placement layouts. Each configuration was optimized in a coupled SAP2000–MATLAB procedure with Particle Swarm, Grey Wolf, Honey Badger, and Aquila optimization (180 runs in total); no single algorithm was best for every configuration. Mean weight increased from 2537 kN at 17 storeys to 7103 kN at 30 storeys. X-bracing gave the highest mean weight at all heights and K-bracing the lowest at 17 and 24 storeys, whereas V- and K-bracing differed by only 2.4% at 30 storeys. Bracing type changed the mean weight by up to about 30%, and brace placement by about 10–15%. Among six regression models, Ridge achieved the highest mean five-fold cross-validated R2 (0.914; 0.904 over 1000 repeated partitions), while Random Forest gave the lowest RMSE (511.7 kN); in leave-one-out prediction, Ridge ordered 90.3% of configuration pairs correctly. The resulting Ridge equation offers an interpretable screening tool within the investigated design domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Üstüner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: