AIMS: To develop a sex-aligned polygenic risk score (PRS) for early-stage type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children without a first-degree family history of T1D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Global Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Array was performed in 16 335 individuals without a first-degree family history of T1D, including 13 956 newborns from the background population of Bavaria, Germany, 240 children with early-stage and 1094 with islet autoantibody-positive Stage 3 T1D from Bavaria as cases and a validation cohort of 695 patients with clinical T1D. Previously developed PRS were assessed and sex-aligned PRS for boys and for girls were developed from 150 SNPs defining 14 HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and 143 T1D genetic susceptibility regions. RESULTS: PRS were similar between children with early-stage T1D and stage 3 T1D for the GPPAD GRS (median 12.8 vs. 12.8, p = 0.81) and the GRS2 (median 13.8 vs. 13.9, p = 0.1). At thresholds corresponding to the 99.2 centile of the background population, the estimated risk for early-stage T1D was higher in boys than girls using both the GPPAD GRS (10.7% in boys vs. 6.8% in girls) and GRS2 (16.4% vs. 8.6%). Novel full (150 SNP) and short (38 SNP) sex-aligned early-stage T1D PRS discriminated cases from controls with around 90% area under the receiver operator characteristic curve in boys and girls. Estimated risks for boys and girls at the 99.2 centile of the background population using the sex-aligned PRS converged, but differences were not eliminated (12.6% for boys, 9.3% for girls). CONCLUSIONS: PRS in children with early-stage and Stage 3 T1D are highly comparable, but suggest a sex bias in early-stage Type 1 diabetes risk in children with high PRS. A sex-aligned PRS was predicted to reduce, but not eliminate, sex-related differences in predicted risk. The PRS was developed primarily in a paediatric population of predominantly European ancestry and requires independent external validation, including in other ancestry groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zapardiel‐Gonzalo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: