Lower extremity injuries are common among amateur football players, resulting in reduced performance and a prolonged absence from the sport. While most injury prevention programmes focus on the knee, hip and trunk, comparatively little attention has been given to multimodal foot–ankle and lower-limb training programmes incorporating the foot core framework. This study aimed to develop a foot core-based training programme using the Knowledge Transfer Scheme (KTS) and evaluate changes in lower extremity performance outcomes in male amateur football players compared with a control group. This study employed a two-phase design based on the KTS. In the first phase, a six-week foot core-based training programme was developed through expert consultation and a structured evidence synthesis conducted specifically to support intervention development. In the second phase, male amateur football players were allocated to a foot core training group (FCTG; n = 34) or a control group (CG; n = 47) according to their own voluntary choice of training arm. All participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments, which included vertical and horizontal jump tests, 10-, 20- and 30-metre sprint tests, the 505 agility test, the Y-Balance test and the navicular drop test. In the FCTG, vertical jump performance increased by 8.55% from baseline (time × group interaction: p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.350), horizontal jump performance increased by 3.8% ( p = 0.049, partial η² = 0.048), and right navicular drop decreased by 15.44% (13.19% on the left; p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.513). Significant time × group interactions were also observed for Y-Balance Test scores ( p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.439) and for all sprint distances (10, 20, and 30 m). Changes in the control group were minimal. Given the quasi-experimental design, these findings should be interpreted with caution and do not establish causality. The multimodal foot core-based training programme was associated with greater pre–post changes in lower-extremity performance outcomes and a greater reduction in navicular drop (an indirect, static measure of medial longitudinal arch behaviour) than routine training alone in male amateur football players. These findings are hypothesis-generating: they do not establish that the programme caused these differences, and randomised controlled trials are needed to test whether such programmes are useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Er et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: