Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compared to traditional spark ignition systems, jet ignition in hydrogen-fueled engines shows strong potential for improving efficiency and reducing emissions. However, research on jet-ignited hydrogen engines remains limited, particularly regarding combustion behavior, emissions, and control parameter effects. This study experimentally investigates a heavy-duty direct-injection hydrogen engine with a jet ignition system under active and passive modes. The effects of spark timing, excess air ratio (λ), and pre-chamber fuel energy ratio are evaluated. Results indicate that spark timing primarily controls combustion phasing with minimal impact on combustion duration. At a CA50 of approximately 7 °CA ATDC, the maximum ITE reached 43.0 % in passive mode and 42.0 % in active mode. Over λ = 1.6–2.6, the combustion duration was 5.0–9.3 °CA in passive mode and 4.3–8.5 °CA in active mode. Active operation produced more advanced combustion phasing and higher peak pressure because of its greater ignition energy. ITE increased with λ, reaching 42.2 % and 41.3 % at λ = 2.6 in passive and active modes, respectively, while nitrogen oxides approached zero at λ ≥ 2.4. Two pre-ignition events occurred at λ = 2.7 under active operation. ITE remained approximately 41–42 % as the pre-chamber fuel-energy ratio increased from 0.8 % to 0.9 %, but decreased to approximately 36.5 % at 2.7 %, accompanied by increased NOx emissions. Thus, pre-chamber fueling should be limited to the minimum required for reliable ignition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: