The unit of account is treated in most monetary theory as inseparable from the medium of exchange. This paper states the conditions under which it can be separated, and derives a construction that meets them without discretionary parameters. Three mathematical axioms are stated - that the unit is a ratio rather than a level, that its denominator is a physical quantity rather than a price, and that it be defined without a trend term - together with seven institutional axioms that a published index must satisfy. Discretion is defined and audited specification by specification; the central proposition shows which specifications carry a revisable parameter and which do not. The construction P = G_t/G_t0, anchored to the above-ground gold stock, is then derived as the zero-parameter case, and its growth stability is stated as a testable condition that four candidate anchors (gold, silver, tin, copper) are checked against. The paper closes with what the construction cannot do: it does not remove commodity price risk, measurement error in the stock series, or the governance problem of who publishes the number. JEL classification: E40; E42; E52; F33; B12 Note. This working paper reproduces Chapter 3 of the monograph The Independence of the Unit of Account: A Theory of Monetary Function Decoupling with Empirical Evidence and Institutional Design (2026). It is a working paper and has not been peer reviewed. Replication package. The empirical chapters of the monograph are documented in an accompanying replication package (135 files) archived at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23255744 Companion material. One of three working papers drawn from the same monograph: WP1 (axiomatic foundations), WP2 (purchasing-power deviation), WP3 (policy exposure and null results).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aizhong Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: