Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In AI–human conversations, engagement emerges through exchanges between users and AI, where each prompt may relate contextually and linguistically to prior turns. This study introduces a user prompt–AI response–user prompt (UP-AIR-UP) triad approach to examine these relationships and proposes a two-level taxonomy. The first level captures contextual connections between prompts (topic shift, prompt-to-prompt, prompt-to-AI response, and integrative prompts), while the second level assesses linguistic dependency (dependent vs. independent). Using data from healthcare chatbot interactions (106 prompts), results show that only 28% of prompts reflected contextual connections to AI responses or integrative behavior, with most prompts being linguistically independent. This pattern may suggest a less interactive mode of conversation, with users often treating chatbots as search tools. Unlike subjective self-report or physiological measures, this approach offers a low-cost, objective way to evaluate user interaction and can support models of user engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadralashrafi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: