Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: This study evaluated the bonding performance of four universal adhesive systems applied to sound dentin (SD) and artificially caries-affected dentin subjected to biomimetic remineralization with casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP–ACP), before and after artificial aging. Methods: One hundred and four human molars were allocated according to dentin substrate (SD or biomimetically remineralized [BRD]), adhesive system (FuturaBond® M+, Scotchbond™ Universal, Prime&Bond Active®, and One Coat7 Universal®), and aging (24 h or 10,000 thermocycles). Artificially caries-affected dentin was produced by pH cycling and subsequently remineralized with CPP–ACP. Adhesive interface morphology was assessed by FEG-ESEM, while shear bond strength (SBS) and failure modes were also evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Adhesive layer thickness was significantly affected by the adhesive system, dentin substrate, and aging (p < 0.001), with a significant adhesive × substrate interaction (p < 0.001). Resin tag length was affected by the adhesive system (p = 0.03), substrate (p < 0.001), and aging (p < 0.001), with significant adhesive × substrate (p = 0.03) and adhesive × substrate × aging interactions (p = 0.001). SBS was significantly higher on SD than on BRD (p < 0.001) and decreased after thermocycling (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Universal adhesives exhibited substrate- and aging-dependent behaviour. BRD showed lower SBS than SD, while morphological differences did not consistently correspond to higher bond strength. Further studies including untreated artificially caries-affected dentin are needed to determine the specific contribution of CPP–ACP remineralization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: