Hydrogen-assisted degradation of metals is governed by the local hydrogen population available at near-surface lattice sites and defects. However, atomistic mechanical simulations commonly employ hydrogen concentrations that are not representative of realistic exposure conditions. In this study, ReaxFF-based reactive molecular dynamics is used to translate sustained CH4 and CH4 + H2O exposure on a Ni(211) surface under an accelerated closed-cell protocol at 1000–1350 K into exposure-conditioned hydrogen availability descriptors. Three independent trajectories are performed for each exposure-temperature condition to quantify the normalized Ni-associated H inventory, hydrogen partitioning between adsorbed and subsurface regions, and localization across CN-defined step and terrace regions. A key finding is a dry–wet inversion in hydrogen accessibility. Although CH4 + H2O exposure produces a larger normalized Ni-associated H inventory (θH = 0.67–0.77), 71.6–86.1% of that inventory is primarily O-bound, while less than 3.5% of the geometrically defined near-surface H population lies within the subsurface window. In contrast, CH4-only exposure yields a smaller normalized Ni-associated H inventory (θH = 0.088–0.447) but substantially greater subsurface partitioning, reaching 12.3% at 1350 K. These results show that the surface with the largest normalized Ni-associated H inventory does not necessarily have the largest geometric subsurface fraction. Furthermore, CH4 + H2O suppresses carbon accumulation, sustains an oxygen-containing surface state, and maintains higher per-site hydrogen localization around CN-defined step regions. Additional Ni(111) and laterally doubled Ni(211) checks retain the wet-over-dry H areal-density ordering and the complementary dry-over-wet subsurface-fraction ordering at 1250 K. The resulting protocol-specific descriptors provide candidate inputs for controlled downstream simulations of hydrogen transport, trapping, and degradation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tebo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: