Background/Objectives: To evaluate the two-year efficacy and safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) implantation in an Asian cohort with primary open-angle glaucoma via post hoc exploratory comparison of standalone PMS versus combined phacoemulsification and PMS (PMS+Phaco). Methods: This prospective single-centre cohort study included 30 consecutive eyes of 30 patients who underwent PMS implantation and were followed for 24 months. Nine eyes underwent standalone PMS and 21 underwent PMS+Phaco. The primary outcome was surgical success assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Qualified success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6–21 mmHg with ≥20% reduction from baseline, with or without IOP-lowering medication; complete success required no glaucoma medications. Failure was defined as not meeting success criteria at two consecutive visits, with the earliest failure at 3 months. WGA-style definitions were retained to ensure comparison with the published literature. Results: Median age was 73 years (IQR 70–78), baseline IOP was 16.0 mmHg (14.0–18.4), and patients were using a median of 3 (2–3) IOP-lowering medications. At 24 months, median IOP was 15.0 mmHg (13.0–17.1), with 57% of eyes remaining medication-free. Whole-cohort qualified success at 24 months was 36.7% (95% CI 20.1–53.4). Qualified success was 44.4% (95% CI 13.6–71.9) for standalone PMS and 33.3% (14.9–53.1) for PMS+Phaco (log-rank p = 0.586). Using alternative IOP thresholds, 83.2% of eyes achieved qualified success at IOP < 18 mmHg and 76.5% did so below the cohort baseline mean of 16.5 mmHg. Corneal oedema was more frequent after combined surgery (38.1% vs. 0%). Bleb needling was required in 40% of eyes. Conclusions: PMS implantation, performed alone or with phacoemulsification, was associated with sustained reduction in medication burden, with 57% of eyes remaining medication-free at 24 months. Absolute IOP control over 24 months was modest. In post hoc exploratory analysis, no difference in surgical success was detected between procedural approaches; however, confidence intervals were wide and data were insufficient to establish equivalence. Low success rates using conventional criteria likely reflect the cohort’s relatively low baseline IOP (median 16.0 mmHg).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: