Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) classification increasingly relies on learning frameworks that exploit medical image representations without centralizing raw data. This study presents FedQDFU, a feature-based federated quantum learning benchmark evaluating a compact variational quantum classifier (VQC) on deep features from VGG16, ResNet50, and DenseNet121, using frozen ImageNet-pretrained backbones as fixed feature extractors over 1020 samples from a single public DFU dataset (696 unique feature vectors after exact-duplicate auditing). Because patient identifiers are unavailable, duplicate-group-aware splitting prevents exact duplicates from crossing the development-test boundary but cannot guarantee patient-level independence. A 6-qubit VQC (43 parameters) is compared with a 129-parameter multilayer perceptron (MLP) under centralized learning, FedAvg, and FedProx across IID and Dirichlet non-IID client distributions (α∈{10,1,0.5,0.1}), with federated-compatible random projection, five-seed evaluation of the primary conditions, and bootstrap confidence intervals on a locked test set. At the primary non-IID setting (α=0.5), the VQC attains a lower mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) than the MLP on all three backbones (e.g., ResNet50: 0.782±0.011 vs. 0.650±0.041 under FedAvg); the paired bootstrap difference is significant only for ResNet50 at the uncorrected pairwise 95% level (ΔMCC=−0.115, 95% CI [−0.218,−0.016]), an effect a Bonferroni correction across backbones is estimated to remove, so this result should be read as suggestive rather than confirmed. No significant centralized-to-FedAvg VQC degradation is detected for any backbone, and a ResNet50 parameter-matched experiment shows the MLP-VQC gap persists even when the MLP is reduced to 41 parameters. Under severe non-IID heterogeneity (α=0.1), the seed-42 partition contains one entirely single-class client (mean pairwise Jensen–Shannon divergence 0.5653 vs. 0.1787 at α=0.5); federated aggregation of this degenerate update yields a fixed-threshold collapse in which all test samples are assigned the positive class (MCC = 0, sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0). This outcome is realization-dependent rather than deterministic: only one of five paired partition/training seeds reproduces the complete collapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: