Veterinary medicine is experiencing increasing clinical complexity, workforce strain, and challenges in clinician-client-team interactions that can impair cooperation, decision-making, and care delivery. Although kindness is often viewed as a personal attribute, evidence from neuroscience, behavioral science, human healthcare, and emerging veterinary literature suggests that specific kindness-related clinical behaviors may influence how people experience and respond to veterinary encounters. This narrative review examines how behaviors such as agenda-setting, permission-based pacing, low-stress handling, nonjudgmental option framing, using the teach-back method, following up, and performing short team debriefs are intended to reduce stress and defensiveness, strengthen trust, preserve engagement, and support decision-making during difficult clinical interactions. It also outlines practical ways these behaviors may be incorporated into veterinary clinical workflows and identifies priorities for veterinary-specific research. Although causal relationships in veterinary settings remain to be established, this review offers a practical way to examine how quality of interactions may influence safety, care delivery, and workforce sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: