Nigeria's persistent fiscal crisis, characterized by escalating debt burdens exceeding 100% of revenue and chronic budget deficits, reflects a fundamental governance failure rooted in a systemic trust deficit rather than merely technical economic challenges. This conceptual and policy-oriented study examines the interlocking relationship between ethical leadership, institutional credibility, and fiscal sustainability in Nigeria, drawing on institutional theory, institutional corruption theory, and the behavioral tax compliance model. Through thematic analysis and conceptual synthesis of secondary sources including academic journals, institutional reports, and recent empirical studies published between 2022 and 2026, the study develops the "Fiscal Credibility Trap" (FCT) Framework, demonstrating how unethical leadership and weak institutional credibility create a self-perpetuating cycle where low public trust fuels tax evasion, inefficient expenditure, and unsustainable debt, which further erodes trust and institutional credibility. The findings reveal that while fiscal reforms like the SFTAS program have improved transparency, fiscal accountability remains elusive, with states often complying with reform requirements symbolically while evading their spirit to preserve discretion and rents. The study concludes that sustainable fiscal development requires a comprehensive approach centered on strengthening ethical leadership, enhancing transparency and accountability, fostering participatory governance, and building professional institutions capable of restoring public trust. Recommendations include institutionalizing ethical leadership development, strengthening oversight institutions, rebuilding the social contract through citizen engagement, addressing the political economy of reform, and harmonizing subnational fiscal governance frameworks to break the vicious cycle and create a virtuous cycle of sustainable development in Nigeria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MUSA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: