Graphene oxide (GO) promotes cell adhesion and chondrogenic differentiation, while thermosensitive hydrogels enable injectable and in situ gelling for minimally invasive repair. This study prepared a GO/thermosensitive block copolymer (PEP) composite hydrogel and evaluated its effects on nucleus pulposus cell (NPC) behavior and intervertebral disc regeneration. GO was synthesized by a modified Hummers method and PEP by atom transfer radical polymerization. GO/PEP hydrogels with varying GO concentrations (0–1.0 mg/mL) were formulated. NPCs isolated from rat coccygeal discs were treated with GO/PEP extracts; cell proliferation was assessed by CCK_8 and viability by Calcein_AM/PI staining. In vivo, a mouse tail puncture_induced intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) model was established. Mice were randomized into sham, PBS_treated IDD, and GO/PEP_treated IDD groups ( n = 8/group). At 4 and 8 weeks post_injection, disc tissues were harvested for histology and NPC counting. GO/PEP extracts dose_dependently reduced NPC mortality (significant at GO ≥0.1 mg/mL, p < 0.05) and increased NPC proliferation (significant at GO ≥0.2 mg/mL, p < 0.01). In the IDD model at 4 weeks, NPC count in the IDD + PBS group (103 ± 15.34) was significantly lower than in the sham group (675 ± 12.75, p < 0.001). The GO/PEP group showed increased NPC count at 4 weeks (337 ± 21.47, p < 0.01 vs sham) and further recovery at 8 weeks (665 ± 14.58, not significantly different from sham, p > 0.05). Histological analysis revealed restored annulus fibrosus integrity, even NPC distribution, reduced central cavity, and enhanced proteoglycan recovery. In conclusion, the GO/PEP thermosensitive hydrogel exhibits excellent biocompatibility and injectability, inhibits NPC apoptosis, promotes proliferation, and restores degenerated disc structure, offering a promising cell_free, minimally invasive strategy for IDD treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: