Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) receiver streams contain irregular updates and within-trajectory gaps that may reflect forecast uncertainty. We evaluate reception-conditioned residual calibration using established global and Mondrian split conformal methods. The KLAF archive contains 99,736,221 observations from 5161 aircraft over 463 observed dates; repeated experiments use 1,001,738 observations from 276 complete aircraft–days. Training-selected reported-state constant velocity achieves a test mean horizontal distance error (MDE) of 0.848 km and root-mean-square error of 1.385 km on 220,061 common predictor cases. A finite-adjacent-heading calculation labels 99.97% of these cases; stable and maneuvering MDEs are 0.578 and 1.993 km. On 220,040 identical raw forecast cases, causal selective preprocessing increases MDE by 0.0054 km (95% day-cluster interval 0.0045–0.0061). At 90% target coverage, nominal and degraded reception radii are 2.974 and 3.666 km, with a degraded-to-nominal ratio of 1.233 (95% interval 1.143–1.284). At 95%, the ratio is 1.175 (1.108–1.209). Degraded empirical coverage is 89.49% and 93.79%, respectively. Wider degraded radii persist across segmentation, reception-threshold, and motion-stratified analyses. These are empirical out-of-time results for eligible, matched forecasts from one selected terminal benchmark; chronological splitting and cluster resampling do not establish formal conformal validity under the observed dependence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: