Introduction WHO recommends high-dose vitamin A supplementation (VAS) in vitamin A-deficient areas. Many countries deliver VAS in national campaigns. Based on randomised trials from the 1980s to 1990s, such campaigns are assumed to reduce all-cause mortality by 12–24%. There has been no analysis of the real-life effect of VAS campaigns on all-cause mortality.Methods We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the real-life effect of ‘VAS’ campaigns (defined as VAS±simultaneous deworming) on all-cause mortality. In November 2025 we searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies involving children <5 years of age that investigated VAS campaigns based on individual-level data and reported all-cause mortality. ROBINS-I was used to assess the methodological quality. Some campaigns provided VAS in combination with vaccines (oral polio vaccine (OPV) or measles vaccine). Meta-estimates were calculated as random (prioritised) and fixed effect estimates overall and by sex and age group.Results We identified five observational studies covering the period from 1999 to 2019, including a total of 163 996 children and 5449 deaths. Four studies were of moderate risk of bias, one of critical risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed no benefit of VAS campaigns on all-cause mortality, the random effect estimate being 1.07 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.38) (fixed effect estimate 1.17 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.32)). In males, the meta-estimate was 1.18 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.52) and in females 1.06 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.33). In comparison, the estimate for ‘OPV-only’ campaigns was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.85) (p for same effect of ‘Any VAS’ vs ‘OPV-only’ campaigns <0.001).Conclusion The available low-certainty evidence did not support the assumption that current VAS campaigns reduce all-cause mortality. Contextual analyses of ‘OPV-only’ campaigns in the same settings showed beneficial effect. The effect of VAS may have changed over time. Contemporary randomised or robust quasi-experimental studies are needed to support the continued use of VAS campaigns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: