Background Layered plaque, representing organized thrombus overlying a previously disrupted plaque, is a marker of coronary destabilization and plaque vulnerability. Despite its clinical relevance, identifying layered plaque remains expert dependent with interobserver variability, limiting large-scale assessment. We developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) model for layered plaque segmentation, and assessed occurrence and associations with plaque vulnerability in non-culprit lesions. Methods Optical coherence tomography (OCT) pullbacks from the PECTUS-obs and ORANGE datasets were used to develop an enhanced version of our validated multiclass segmentation model (OCT-AID), by adding layered plaque as an additional pixel-level class. Pullbacks were divided into a training set ( n = 4121 frames, 493 with layered plaque) and an independent held-out test set ( n = 433 frames, 71 with layered plaque). Using this model, prevalence of layered plaque and associations with plaque vulnerability features were studied in patients with non-culprit lesions (PECTUS-obs data; 414 patients, 488 lesions). Results The model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.68 ± 0.27 for layered plaque segmentation, with pullback-level sensitivity of 96.2% and specificity of 75.0%. At least one layered plaque was present in 366/414 patients (88.4%). Presence of layered plaque was higher in STEMI patients ( p = 0.018) . Lesions containing layered plaques showed higher prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (76.4% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.008 ), thin-cap fibroatheroma (29.2% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.016 ), macrophage accumulation (25.0% vs 9.4%, p = 0.010 ), and cholesterol clefts (0.0% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.009 ). Conclusions Automated OCT-based identification of layered plaque using AI is feasible. In non-culprit coronary lesions, layered plaque was highly prevalent and associated with established markers of plaque vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waerden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: