Background: Antenatal anxiety and fear of childbirth (FOC) are common yet under-recognized, especially in the developing world, despite knowing that it affects delivery outcomes as well as birth experience. A study was done to assess the screening performance of Hindi versions of validated anxiety questionnaires in term pregnancy against the Fear-of-Birth Scale. The reliability of Hindi versions of the Stirling Antenatal Anxiety Scale (SAAS), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), and Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ10), along with major determinants of antenatal anxiety. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of the screening performance of three fear-of-birth scores (SAAS, STAI-6, W-DEQ10) in Hindi, conducted on term pregnant women. The Hindi adaptation was evaluated by experts, pilot-tested, and applied to enrolled pregnancy cases from the antenatal Out-patient department (OPD). Content validity, reliability, correlation, and regression were analyzed. Results: The Hindi versions showed a Content Validity Index of 0.93 (SAAS), 0.88 (W-DEQ-10), and 0.86 (STAI-6); Cronbach’s α values were 0.891 and 0.816, and Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin values were 0.87 (SAAS) and 0.774 (W-DEQ-10). SAAS was found to be the most reliable, with Cohen’s kappa of 0.48, a correlation coefficient ( r ) of 0.563, an area under the curve of 0.77, and a sensitivity of 79%, whereas STAI was the least reliable. Overall antenatal anxiety was noted in 53% of enrolled cases and was significantly higher in at-risk pregnancies ( p = .023). Conclusions: The Hindi SAAS version was found to be the most reliable and feasible tool for antenatal anxiety screening, in agreement with the Fear of Birth Visual Analog Scale. High-risk pregnancy was an independent predictor of anxiety and a high burden (53%) of unrecognized anxiety, supporting the strong need for screening tools in routine maternity settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: