X-ray computed tomography (CT) has become the reference non-destructive technique for the three-dimensional characterization of the pore structures of cementitious materials. This review maps 140 application studies—spanning cement paste, mortar and concrete, from air-entrained, cellular and recycled-aggregate systems to alkali-activated binders, ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and 3D-printed materials—and the underlying image-analysis methodology is inventoried separately and excluded from all frequency statistics. Each study is classified by voxel-size class (sub-micron, <1 µm; micro, 1–20 µm; meso, 20–100 µm; macro, >100 µm; multiscale), with voxel size being a sampling parameter rather than a spatial resolution, and by the pore metrics it reports under six metric families. The synthesis reveals similar concentrations at the micro (48/140) and meso (50/140) scales, a dominance of porosity and pore-size distribution at every scale, and pronounced under-use of higher-order shape and spatial statistics: flatness, elongation and pair-correlation functions each appear in less than 2% of studies. Systematic discrepancies between scales are analyzed: resolution-conditioned porosity, the representative elementary volume–resolution dilemma, segmentation-induced variance comparable to material effects, and the persistent CT–mercury intrusion porosity mismatch. Priorities are standardized segmentation benchmarks, scale-bridging registration protocols, routine uncertainty reporting and broader adoption of quantitative shape and spatial descriptors. Provisional assignments are flagged in the dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: