AbstractPurpose: The primary goal in traumatic lacrimal canalicular lacerations is to restore canalicular continuity and prevent permanent epiphora. This study evaluated anatomical and functional outcomes and postoperative complications of Bowman probe-guided repair using a 24-gauge intravenous cannula in urgent cases where commercial canalicular stents were unavailable.Materials and methods: This retrospective single-center case series included patients undergoing primary canalicular repair with this technique between January 2022 and December 2025. Patients with incomplete records or follow-up shorter than 3 months were excluded. Demographics, injury characteristics, surgical details, cannula retention, follow-up, success rates, and complications were recorded. Anatomical success was defined as lacrimal patency on irrigation at final follow-up; functional success as absence of epiphora (Munk score 0).Results: Twenty-one patients (15 male; mean age 36±16 years) were included. The lower canaliculus was most frequently involved. Fifteen patients underwent repair within 24 hours; 19 underwent concurrent eyelid repair. Mean cannula retention and follow-up were 3.8±1.0 and 9.5±2.7 months, respectively. Anatomical and functional success were achieved in 18 (85.7%) and 17 (81.0%) patients, respectively. Complications included corneal abrasion in 3 (14.3%), early cannula loss in 2 (9.5%), and canalicular stenosis in 1 (4.8%). No punctal granuloma or wound infection occurred.Conclusion: Bowman probe-guided canalicular repair using a 24-gauge intravenous cannula achieved favorable early-to-intermediate anatomical and functional outcomes with manageable complications in this limited series. In urgent cases without commercial stents, it may be considered a readily available alternative. These findings should be supported by prospective studies with larger sample sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parça et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: