Predictions of the Diósi–Penrose (DP) gravity-related collapse model depend strongly on the mass-density smoothing length R₀ and on the frequency spectrum of the gravitational fluctuations. We reanalyze the public low-energy electronic-recoil data of XENONnT (1–30 keV, 433 events, 1.16 t·yr) with an unbinned likelihood and report four results. First, when R₀ exceeds the atomic size, the equivalence principle makes the nucleus and its electrons accelerate together, and low-energy X-ray emission is strongly cancelled (about 2×10⁻⁴ at 1 keV and 0.16 at 10 keV for xenon). Including this screening, the bound on the white-noise DP model is R₀ > ~0.9 nm, much weaker than the unscreened value (~4.0 nm). Second, the reported bound R₀ > 2.8 nm of an earlier collapse analysis of XENONnT data appears to differ from the Majorana analysis in signal normalization by a factor π^(3/2). With the same normalization it corresponds to 1.56 nm, in agreement with the 1.52 nm we obtain under the same conditions. Third, an 'atomic-unit' variant, with R₀ set to the atomic radius and the fluctuation cutoff set to the electronic time scale, cannot be decided with these data: its verdict ranges from allowed (prediction/limit 0.006) to excluded (11) depending on how strongly the electrons co-move with the nucleus. Fourth, a parameter-free 'phonon-unit' variant, with both R₀ and the cutoff fixed by the lattice vibration of the same nucleus (Debye–Waller rms displacement and Debye frequency), passes the X-ray data independently of the screening treatment and predicts spontaneous heating of about 9.4 pW/kg in copper at cryogenic temperature. This lies just below the currently known unexplained heat-leak limit (~10 pW/kg). X-rays cannot separate the two variants; the (atomic mass × Debye temperature)^(3/2) heating scaling predicted by the phonon-unit variant can be tested by comparing heat leaks in tungsten and aluminium (a factor of about 16).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeongbin Im (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: