Surgeons performing thoracolumbar spine surgery under mobile C-arm fluoroscopy receive scattered radiation whose spatial distribution cannot be seen. A visualization system combining a pinhole collimator, a cesium iodide scintillator, a high-sensitivity complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera and a depth camera was placed at the surgeon’s position, and its images were composed on a three-dimensional point cloud of the operating room. A torso phantom was irradiated once per condition in the lateral (LR) and under-table (AP) projections, without a movable lead-glass plate and with it at two heights. Sources appeared on the beam-entrance surface and the operating table. At the pinhole, 140 cm above the floor, the dose rate without the plate was 29.7 mSv/h (LR) and 15.6 mSv/h (AP), 9.6 and 5.0 µSv per exposure, a ratio of 1.9; a lower edge at 135 cm gave no measurable reduction, and at 120 cm the dose rate fell by 20% (LR) and 6% (AP). Monte Carlo simulation with a validated model of the same tube head gave a ratio of 1.90 at the measurement position and reproduced the null at 135 cm. Projection choice mattered more than plate position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujibuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: