High penetration of renewable energy and dynami=c topology variations demand fast, accurate, and topology-adaptive power-flow (PF) prediction. Traditional iterative PF methods are computationally expensive and may have convergence difficulties under repeated scenario evaluation or topology changes. Purely data-driven models often fail to capture topological heterogeneity and physical constraints, which limits generalization and physical consistency. This study proposes PI-HeteroGNN, a modularity-guided physics-informed heterogeneous graph neural network for PF prediction. It models loads, generators, composite nodes, and slack buses as distinct node types; encodes branch conductance and susceptance as relation-dependent edge features; and introduces modularity Q mod to represent community structure and regional coupling. AC PF residuals are incorporated during training to promote nodal active- and reactive-power balance. Experiments on the IEEE 118-bus system and subgraphs show that, relative to GINE, PI-HeteroGNN reduces full-system MAEs by 5.7%, 6.2%, 6.2%, and 5.7% for load-bus voltage angle, load-bus voltage magnitude, generator-bus reactive power, and generator-bus voltage angle, respectively. After removal of ten lines, it retains a mean error of 0.947% and a 95th-percentile error of 1.883%, representing reductions of 10.2% and 10.8% relative to GINE. These results demonstrate improved accuracy, physical consistency, and topology generalization for the evaluated PF prediction tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: