In this exploratory study, two Sauvignon Blanc wines produced from a single grape lot in the Brazilian Cerrado were chemically characterized. T1 was fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae , whereas T2 was co-inoculated with S. cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora vineae . One fermentation was conducted per condition, and the reported triplicates were repeated analytical measurements of the same wines. Analyses included physicochemical parameters, Folin-Ciocalteu reducing capacity, flavonoid content, DPPH • and ABTS •+ radical-scavenging assays, voltammetry, and GC-MS profiling of free and glycosidically bound volatile compounds. T2 had a higher pH, lower total acidity and malic acid, and a higher lactic acid concentration, indicating more advanced spontaneous malolactic fermentation at the time of analysis. T1 showed a higher Folin-Ciocalteu response, whereas T2 showed lower DPPH • and ABTS •+ IC 50 values and a slightly higher electrochemical index. These observations are reported descriptively because independent fermentation replicates were not available. GC-MS analysis tentatively identified 57 free volatile compounds, mainly esters and alcohols. The semi-quantitative internal-standard-equivalent estimate of 2-phenylethyl acetate was higher in T2 (28.57 µg L −1 ). Nineteen compounds were tentatively identified after hydrolysis of the glycosidically bound fraction, including terpenoid-, norisoprenoid-, and benzenoid-related compounds. This study therefore provides an initial, hypothesis-generating chemical characterization of two Sauvignon Blanc vinifications from the Brazilian Cerrado.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guimarães et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: