Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mutation testing (Mutation Analysis), although powerful in revealing faults, is considered a computationally expensive criterion, due to the high number of mutants created and the effort to determine the equivalent mutants. Using mutation-based alternative testing criteria it is possible to reduce the number of mutants but it is still necessary to determine the equivalent ones. In this paper the Bayesian Learning(one of the Artificial Intelligence techniques used in machine learning) is investigated to define the Bayesian Learning-Based Equivalent Detection Technique (BaLBEDeT), which provides guidelines to help the tester to analyze the live mutants in order to determine the equivalent ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincenzi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: