Key result
Continuing perioperative aspirin fails to reduce overall complications during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Why the study?
New cardiology guidelines recommend antiplatelet therapy for some patients with cardiac stents, but aspirin use is relatively contraindicated during urologic surgery due to bleeding risk.
Meta-Analysis (n=1,481)
May support aspirin continuation in stented RARP patients without excess complications; leaves open confirmation in larger prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: New cardiology guidelines recommend antiplatelet therapy for some patients with cardiac stents. Aspirin use is relatively contraindicated during urologic surgery because of increased bleeding risk. We sought to review the outcomes of patients who continued aspirin during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2007 and February 2010, 249 patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. After consultation with the patients' cardiologists, 6 patients had coronary artery stents and continued aspirin perioperatively (Group 1), and 7 patients had coronary artery stents but did not continue aspirin perioperatively (Group 2). The remaining 236 patients had no coronary artery stents and did not require continued aspirin (Group 3). We analyzed our patients' preoperative characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen volume, and D'Amico risk, as well as operative time, blood loss, hematocrit changes, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: We found no differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, changes in hematocrit, or length of hospital stay. No patients with any type of cardiac stent required a postoperative blood transfusion or had complications requiring more than simple anti-emetics, analgesics, or electrolyte correction. Nine patients in Group 3 required interventions for significant complications. CONCLUSION: Larger studies need to be performed to validate these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowfar et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Prostate cancer (n=1,481). Low-dose aspirin vs. Without aspirin (discontinued perioperatively) was evaluated on Overall complication rate (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.50-1.36, p=0.45). Perioperative continuation of low-dose aspirin during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy did not significantly alter the risk of overall complications (RR 0.83) compared to stopping aspirin, though it was associated with a slightly higher blood-transfusion rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: