Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult urology1 Nov 2006The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence Among Community Dwelling Men: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Jennifer T. Anger, Christopher S. Saigal, Lynn Stothers, David H. Thom, Larissa V. Rodríguez, Mark S. Litwin, and Urologic Diseases of America Projectabcd Jennifer T. AngerJennifer T. Anger Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles , Christopher S. SaigalChristopher S. Saigal Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles , Lynn StothersLynn Stothers Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada , David H. ThomDavid H. Thom Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California , Larissa V. RodríguezLarissa V. Rodríguez Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles , Mark S. LitwinMark S. Litwin Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles , and Urologic Diseases of America Projectabcd View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.029AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: To measure the prevalence of urinary incontinence in community dwelling men in the United States, we analyzed data from respondents to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Materials and Methods: From 1999 to 2000 the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey asked a national sample of community dwelling men, "In the past 12 months, have you had difficulty controlling your bladder, including leaking small amounts of urine when you cough or sneeze?" Questionnaire results were recorded and analyzed with respect to demographic data, and compared to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data in women. Results: The overall prevalence of urinary incontinence in men was 17%. Prevalence increased with age from 11% in men 60 to 64 years old to 31% in men 85 years old or older. Of the men reporting any incontinence 42% reported daily incontinence and 24% reported it weekly. Black men had the highest prevalence of male incontinence (21%) and black women had the lowest prevalence of female incontinence (20%). While the prevalence of incontinence in black women was virtually the same as that in black men, the prevalence of incontinence in white and Mexican-American women was at least 2.5 times that of men of the same ethnicity. Conclusions: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey draws a nationally representative sample of subjects from the community and, thus, provides prevalence data for urinary incontinence for all men in the United States. Ethnicity appears to be a contributing risk factor for incontinence, although racial patterns clearly differ between men and women. References 1 : Urinary Incontinence in Men. In: Urologic Diseases in America. Edited by . Washington, D. C: US Government Publishing Office2004: 71. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Publication No. 04-5512. Also accessible at www.uda.niddk.nih.gov. Google Scholar 2 : Urinary incontinence in men: current status and future directions. Nurs Res2004; 53: S36. Google Scholar 3 : Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol2003; 20: 327. Google Scholar 4 : Proceedings of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases International Symposium on Epidemiologic Issues in Urinary Incontinence in Women. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003; 188: S77. Google Scholar 5 : Methods. In: Urologic Diseases in America. Edited by . Washington, D. C: US Government Publishing Office2004: 283. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Publication No. 04-5512, pp. 283–316, 2004. Also accessible at www.uda.niddk.nih.gov. Google Scholar 6 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed February 25, 2006 Google Scholar 7 : Blood mercury level and blood pressure among US women: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2000. Environ Res2005; 97: 195. Google Scholar 8 : Informal caregiving time and costs for urinary incontinence in older individuals in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc2002; 50: 733. Google Scholar 9 : Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc1998; 46: 473. Google Scholar 10 Nygaard, I., Thom, D. and Calhoun, E.: Urinary Incontinence in Women. In: Urologic Diseases in America. Edited by M. S. Litwin and C. S. Saigal. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Washington, D. C.: US Government Publishing Office, NIH Publication No. 04-5512, pp. 71–103, 2004. Also accessible at www.uda.niddk.nih.gov Google Scholar 11 : Prevalence of three lower urinary tract symptoms in men-a population-based study. Fam Pract2003; 20: 7. Google Scholar 12 : Overactive bladder in the male patient: epidemiology, etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Curr Urol Rep2005; 6: 410. Google Scholar 13 : Trends in prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia among black and white men in the United States: 1980 to 1994. Urology1999; 53: 1154. Google Scholar 14 : A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study: Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol2000; 53: 1150. Google Scholar 15 : Urinary incontinence in rural older women: prevalence, incidence and remission. J Am Geriatr Soc1996; 44: 1049. Google Scholar 16 Hunskaar, S., Burgio, K., Diokno, A. C., Herzog, A. R., Hjalmas, K. and Lapitan, M. C.: Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. In: Incontinence. Proceedings of the 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. Edited by P. Abrams, L. Cardozo, S. Khoury and A. Wein. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd., pp. 165–202, 2002 Google Scholar 17 : Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology2003; 62: 16. Google Scholar 18 : Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. J Urol2006; 175: 259. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Prevention of urinary incontinence in adults: population-based strategies. Nurs Res2004; 53: S61. Google Scholar 20 : A cost and value analysis of two interventions with incontinent nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc1995; 43: 1112. Google Scholar © 2006 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDavis N, Vaughan C, Johnson T, Goode P, Burgio K, Redden D and Markland A (2018) Caffeine Intake and its Association with Urinary Incontinence in United States Men: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005–2006 and 2007–2008Journal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 6, (2170-2174), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2013.Markland A, Goode P, Redden D, Borrud L and Burgio K (2018) Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Men: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 3, (1022-1027), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.Kim S, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, Faerber G, McGuire E and Latini J (2018) Long-Term Durability and Functional Outcomes Among Patients With Artificial Urinary Sphincters: A 10-Year Retrospective Review From the University of MichiganJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 5, (1912-1916), Online publication date: 1-May-2008. Volume 176Issue 5November 2006Page: 2103-2108 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2006 by American Urological AssociationKeywordsepidemiologycontinental population groupsage factorssexurinary incontinenceMetricsAuthor Information Jennifer T. Anger Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Christopher S. Saigal Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Lynn Stothers Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author David H. Thom Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Larissa V. Rodríguez Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Mark S. Litwin Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, David Geffen School of Medicine and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Financial interest and/or other relationship with TAP Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Synthelabo and Amgen. More articles by this author Urologic Diseases of America Projectabcd More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anger et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: