Key result
Diabetes linked to ~2.8-fold higher odds of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging.
Why the study?
The relationship between myocardial perfusion imaging abnormalities, diabetes mellitus, and glycemic control in South African populations was unknown.
Cross-Sectional (n=340)
No
Odds Ratio: 2.81
Absolute Event Rate: 85.6% vs 68%
p-value: p=<0.01
May prompt earlier CAD evaluation in diabetes; leaves open whether MPI screening alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) abnormalities, diabetes mellitus, and glucose control in South African populations is unknown. It was hypothesized that in subjects undergoing MPI for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), those with diabetes would have more extensive perfusion defects and that diabetes control would influence MPI abnormalities. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the severity of CAD diagnosed with MPI in subjects with and without diabetes and to determine the relationship between diabetes control and extent of CAD. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 340 subjects in whom MPI scans were performed over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Subjects with diabetes had a higher prevalence of abnormal MPI, with more extensive ischemia, compared with subjects without diabetes (85.6% versus 68%; odds ratio 2.81, P<0.01). Glycated hemoglobin ≥7.0% was associated with a higher risk of abnormal MPI, with more extensive ischemia, compared with subjects having diabetes and glycated hemoglobin <7.0% (odds ratio 2.46, P=0.03) and those without diabetes (odds ratio 4.55, P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Subjects with diabetes have more extensive myocardial ischemia when compared with subjects without diabetes. Furthermore, poorer diabetes control is associated with more abnormalities on MPI scanning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shmendi et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=340). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (OR 2.81, p=<0.01). Subjects with diabetes had a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging compared with subjects without diabetes (85.6% vs 68%; OR 2.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: