Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performance of mineral flotation process in terms of grade and recovery is critically dependent on achieving the optimal gas dispersion in a flotation cell which involves three parameters − superficial gas velocity (j G ), gas holdup ( α ¯ G ), and bubble size (d sea ). In mechanical flotation cells, these parameters have been extensively studied, however current understanding of these parameters in the Reflux Flotation Cell (RFC™) remains significantly limited. This study aims to experimentally measure these parameters in a pilot-scale RFC™ system using high-speed imaging and differential pressure measurement technique by varying four operating fluxes which include − gas (j G = 0.42 to 2.09 cm/s), feed (F = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s), wash water (W = 0.21 to 0.63 cm/s), and underflow (U = 1.46 to 1.88 cm/s). It was noted that increasing F and W fluxes resulted in smaller d sea due to increased shear rate and corresponding bubble breakups. The relationship between d sea and F was linear, while it plateaued with W. With F and W fluxes, the d sea decreased from a maximum of 1.37 and 1.11 mm to a minimum of 0.44 and 0.62 mm, respectively. Conversely, U flux increased d sea at low j G but decreased it at higher j G , with values ranging from ∼ 0.48 to 0.97 mm. Gas holdup exhibited a linear increase with j G but decreased with higher F and W fluxes or reduced U flux. The α ¯ G ranged between ∼ 0.37 and 0.72 for F and ∼ 0.46 and 0.65 for W, while U varied from ∼ 0.30 to 0.64. Feed flux had a stronger impact on d sea , whereas U flux was noted to affect α ¯ G more. Suitable empirical correlations were also developed to predict d sea and α ¯ G which agreed well with the experimental data. The overall hydrodynamics was characterised by two distinct flow regimes − bubbly flow, with minimal bubble coalescence at low j G , and churn-turbulent flow, characterized by frequent coalescence at high j G . It was noted that wash water flux destabilises the bubbly flow regime into churn turbulent flow with transition occurring at α ¯ G ≥ 0.6 and j G = 1.46 cm/s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zakari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: