Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An Al-0.2%Sc alloy and an Al-3%Mg-0.2%Sc alloy were subjected to equal-channel angular pressing to a strain of ∼8 to produce grain sizes of ∼0.7 and ∼0.2 μm, respectively. Because of the presence of some areas of subgrain boundaries in the Al-3%Mg-0.2%Sc alloy, additional samples of this alloy were subjected to ECA pressing to a strain of ∼12. In both alloys, the grain sizes were reasonably stable up to annealing temperatures above 700 K. Tensile specimens were machined from the as-pressed samples for testing at elevated temperatures. The Al-3%Mg-0.2%Sc alloy pressed to a strain of ∼12 exhibited exceptional ductility with elongations up to a maximum of ∼1560% at 673 K at the high strain rate of 3.3×10−2 s−1. By contrast, the Al-0.2%Sc alloy failed under all conditions at elongations <400%. The difference in behavior between these two alloys is attributed to the nature of the deformation mechanism which serves to accommodate the superplastic process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berbon et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: