The molecular structure of 2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5- c ]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide (DTPB), which incorporates biologically relevant triazolopyrimidine and sulfonamide groups, has not yet been comprehensively investigated using theoretical approaches. This work presents the first integrated computational assessment of DTPB, providing a detailed correlation between its structural, electronic, spectroscopic, intermolecular, and molecular recognition characteristics. Density functional theory calculations performed at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level confirmed a well- defined geometry for DTPB. The computed HOMO–LUMO energy gap of 4.61–4.89 eV indicates moderate molecular stability together with favourable intramolecular charge-transfer behaviour. The electronic distribution evaluated using Mulliken population analysis, molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), electron localization function (ELF), and localized orbital locator (LOL) identifies the oxygen- and nitrogen-containing regions as the principal reactive sites. Furthermore, reduced density gradient (RDG) and non-covalent interaction (NCI) analyses reveal that hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions contribute substantially to the stabilization of the molecular structure. The estimated first-order hyperpolarizability (β = 1.5 × 10 −30 esu) is approximately eleven times greater than that of urea (0.13 × 10 −30 esu), highlighting the strong nonlinear optical (NLO) response and efficient charge-transfer characteristics of DTPB. Graph-theoretical evaluation further demonstrates the structural complexity of the molecule, with the calculated topological indices (M₁ = 170, M₂ = 201, and HM = 878). Pharmacokinetic assessment using the BOILED-Egg model predicts poor gastrointestinal absorption together with negligible blood–brain barrier permeability. Molecular docking investigations produced moderate binding affinities toward the protein targets 1 N10, 6OAN, and 1YHY, indicating that DTPB could provide a useful starting scaffold for future ligand optimization, although experimental studies are necessary to validate its predicted biological activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasikala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: