The absence of a peri-implant radiolucency on radiographs is used as a criterion for implant success. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing peri-implant radiolucencies using an experimental model. Astra Tech fixtures were inserted into 20 bony specimens. Later, the fixtures were removed and the prepared cavities were enlarged in 2 steps. The specimens were radiographed under strictly standardized circumstances in the 3 stages ("press-fit" = simulated osseointegration, and "0.1 mm space" and "0.175 mm space" = simulated connective tissue layer). All specimens were radiographed with 2 vertical angulations (0 degree and 15 degrees). Ten observers read the radiographs and evaluated bone-implant relationship on a 5-point scale. The interobserver agreement was low. Specificity was remarkably low, and sensitivity was moderate. A significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found for 0.175 mm peri-implant-space compared to 0.1 mm space. The diagnostic accuracy was found to be highest for 0.175 mm peri-implant space specimens. It is concluded, that radiography seems to be an unreliable method for diagnosing peri-implant spaces, although accuracy improved at increasing space widths. Strict orthogonal projection angles did not improve diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sewerin et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: