Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Article| March 01, 2001 T-phase Stations for the International Monitoring System of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty: A Global Perspective Emile A. Okal Emile A. Okal Department of Geological Sciences Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60201 USA emile@earth.nwu.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.2.186 Article history first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Emile A. Okal; T-phase Stations for the International Monitoring System of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty: A Global Perspective. Seismological Research Letters 2001;; 72 (2): 186–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.2.186 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The enforcement of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) requires the monitoring of acoustic disturbances in the world's oceans in order to guard against the possibility of a nuclear test being hidden either in the water column itself or on a remote island. The traditional means of acoustic monitoring in the water column builds on the experience of the SOSUS project (e.g., Mikhalevsky, 1999), and consists of deploying hydrophones within the SOFAR channel, the layer of low acoustic velocity extending between depths of approximately 600 to 1800 m in the world's oceans, and functioning as a waveguide... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emile A. Okal (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: