Key result
Delivering stop cues during systole shortens stop signal reaction time by ~18 ms vs diastole.
Why the study?
The influence of cardiac cycle timing on response inhibition and motor impulsivity control was unclear, motivating investigation of interoceptive cardiac signals on stop signal task performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systole-timed cues may enhance inhibition experimentally; leaves open translation to clinical cognitive interventions.
Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate control of motor impulsivity. Participants performed a stop signal task, in which stop cues were delivered at different time points within the cardiac cycle: at systole when the heart contracts (T-wave peak, approximately 300 ms following the R-wave), or at diastole between heartbeats (R-wave peak). Response inhibition was better at systole, indexed by a shorter stop signal reaction time (SSRT), and longer stop signal delay (SSD). Furthermore, parasympathetic control of cardiovascular tone, and subjective sensitivity to interoceptive states, predicted response inhibition efficiency, although these cardiovascular and interoceptive correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. This suggests that response inhibition capacity is influenced by interoceptive physiological cues, such that people are more likely to express impulsive actions during putative states of lower cardiovascular arousal, when frequency and strength of cardiac afferent signalling is reduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rae et al. (2018) studied Healthy volunteers (n=46). Task cue presentation at cardiac systole vs. Task cue presentation at cardiac diastole was evaluated on Stop signal reaction time (SSRT) (Mean difference -18.37, 95% CI -33.22, -3.53, p=0.016). Delivering stop cues during cardiac systole significantly improved response inhibition, shortening the stop signal reaction time by 18.37 ms compared to delivery during diastole.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: