Key result
Coronary Sinus Reducer linked to ~1-class reduction in refractory angina at 6 months.
Why the study?
Refractory angina is a major health-care problem and the safety and efficacy of the Coronary Sinus Reducer for symptom relief require evaluation in real-world practice.
Observational (n=132)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5‑year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6‑month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvis et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Refractory angina (n=132). Coronary Sinus Reducer vs. Baseline (no separate control group) was evaluated on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6-month follow-up (p=<0.001). The Coronary Sinus Reducer significantly improved angina symptoms in patients with refractory angina, reducing the mean CCS class from 3.17 to 2.12 at 6 months (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: