This study evaluated fetal-region doses and dose distributions for X-ray pelvimetry (Guthmann and Martius methods) using exposure conditions from a nationwide survey in Japan and compared them with those of a low-dose computed tomography (CT) protocol using a realistic late-pregnancy phantom. A pregnancy model phantom combining an anthropomorphic phantom with a custom-made abdominal phantom was used. Real-time dosimeters were placed at 18 sites across three abdominal levels. The low-dose CT protocol showed a nearly uniform fetal-region dose distribution, whereas the X-ray methods showed heterogeneous distributions depending on beam direction and irradiation field. The reported mean fetal-region doses were 1.16 mGy for Guthmann, 4.05 mGy for Martius, 5.21 mGy for the combined X-ray examinations, and 0.69 mGy for low-dose CT. These results indicate that the low-dose CT protocol evaluated in this study produced a lower fetal-region dose than the Guthmann and Martius methods evaluated in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsunaga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: