The main goal of the present study was to demonstrate the influence of draining cannulas’ position and high-flow extracorporeal CO 2 removal ( ECCO 2 R) configuration on recirculation and extracorporeal decarboxylation. This single-center retrospective study was conducted between January 2018 and May 2024. All patients who received a high-flow ECCO 2 R (extracorporeal blood flow ≥ 2 L/min) were included. Four configurations each used an ECMO device, two single-lumen cannulas, and an ipsilateral cannulation site: CENTRAL DRAINAGE configurations ( central jugular-jugular and central femoro-femoral ), DISTAL DRAINAGE configurations ( distal jugular-jugular and distal femoro-femoral ). Recirculation coefficient and CO 2 elimination were assessed between these configurations. The influence of the configuration and recirculation coefficient on CO 2 elimination was studied by multivariable mixed linear model. Eighteen patients were treated with high-flow ECCO 2 R. Extracorporeal blood flows (median of 2.6 L/min [IQR, 2.0‒2.6 L/min]) were comparable between the configurations ( P = 0.33), although values higher than 2.5 L/min were observed in CENTRAL DRAINAGE configurations. Median CO 2 elimination was 110 mL(STPD)/min (IQR, 83‒149 mL(STPD)/min). Recirculation coefficient was significantly higher with the DISTAL DRAINAGE configurations (59% [IQR, 51‒71%] versus 9% [IQR, 15‒22%], respectively; P < 0.001). Consequently, CO 2 elimination was significantly lower with the DISTAL DRAINAGE configurations (58 mL(STPD)/min [IQR, 44‒72 mL(STPD)/min] versus 122 mL(STPD)/min [IQR, 96‒159 mL(STPD)/min], respectively; P = 0.003). Both DISTAL DRAINAGE configurations and high recirculation coefficient were significantly associated in multivariable analysis with a reduction in CO 2 elimination ( P < 0.001). We evaluated four different configurations of high-flow ECCO 2 R using single-lumen cannulas allowing either a central or a distal drainage. A central drainage configuration gave better rheological conditions and lower recirculation, leading to better extracorporeal decarboxylation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charbit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: