This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This work investigates how the volumetric void fraction (β) modifies the lift coefficient of a symmetric hydrofoil (NACA0015) operating in a confined, air–water two-phase flow. Experiments were carried out in two square test sections (L = 0.15 m and 0.25 m) with hydrofoil chords c = 0.15 m and 0.25 m, mounted either horizontally or vertically. Angles of attack α spanned, bulk liquid velocities ranged from 2m/s to 9m/s, and volumetricvoid fractions were set to β = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, yielding Re ∈ [3.0 × 105, 1.35 × 106].A semi-analytical confinement correction, derived from boundary-layer-driven internal velocity profiles, is applied to take account of the blockage effect according to CL = CL0/(1 − σ)2, with σ the confinement parameter. Based on this corrected lift coefficient, a correlation is proposed to quantify the influence of the volumetric void fraction: a˜(β)/a˜β=0 ≈ 1 − 4.5β, where ˜a is the linear coefficient in CL = aα˜ +˜bα3.The proposed correlation successfully collapses more than 80 experimental cases encompassing different test-section sizes and Reynolds numbers when combined with the confinement correction. The analysis also highlights the role of bubble distribution relative to the hydrofoil orientation within the duct.These findings provide a compact predictive framework for lift under realistic, confined multiphase conditions, and can inform early-stage design and control strategies where bubble injection is used to mitigate instabilities or environmental impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: