Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abrasive belt grinding is a flexible surface finishing process in which precision machining of geometrically complex components often involves coupled parameters and contact mechanisms. Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in domain-specific knowledge questioning. However, their capabilities in numerical computation and mechanism-oriented reasoning remain limited in scenarios involving coupled parameters. This study introduces a structural enhancement mechanism based on formula-group embedding. It integrates formula retrieval, task classification, structured prompting, and code execution into the conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline. The approach addresses numerical computation and mechanistic reasoning in belt grinding and is validated through contact modeling, a representative core problem of the process. In numerical computation tasks, the proposed method achieved 100% accuracy in basic cases. In more challenging scenarios, it reached 90% accuracy with an average deviation within 5%. In contrast, for these complex tasks, general-purpose LLMs achieved only about a 10% pass rate. In mechanism-related reasoning tasks, utilizing a hybrid expert-LLM evaluation, the method demonstrated a 13.1% improvement over the second-best model and a 36.6% gain over the baseline without formula augmentation. These results indicate that the proposed mechanism provides value in improving the reliability of numerical computation and the coherence of mechanistic reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: