The mitigation of algebraic invariants in cryptographic protocols is a fundamental requirement for achieving censorship-resistant, information-theoretic indistinguishability uniform communication against Deep Packet Inspection (DPI). While recent literature and standard paradigms (RFC 9380) heavily optimize the forward Hash-to-Curve operation, the exact mathematical inverse---Point-to-Uniform obfuscation---remains a critical research blind spot. For structurally significant curves with j ∈ \0, 1728\, such as BLS12-381, direct application of the Simplified Shallue--van de Woestijne--Ulas (SSWU) algorithm is impossible, and attempting to invert recent direct encodings in strict constant time introduces a prohibitive multi-branch computational penalty. In this paper, we resolve this algorithmic bottleneck by deriving explicit analytical expressions for the inverse isogeny mappings required to perform highly efficient, constant-time point obfuscation. Specifically, we present the exact inverse functions for the 11-isogeny (φ⁻¹) and 3-isogeny (φ⁻¹) over Fp² for the BLS12-381 curve. Furthermore, we extend this methodology to the family of curves with $j=1728$ (y²=x³+Ax), constructing the dual 2-isogenies and demonstrating that the target curve uniquely possesses $j=287496$, guaranteeing an unconditionally reversible SSWU mapping. By integrating these deterministic, extraction-free inverse isogenies with the Elligator Squared framework, we provide a rigorous mechanism for the steganographic obfuscation of both public keys (G₁) and digital signatures (G₂). Finally, we introduce a novel steganographic filter for curve generation and present the proof-of-concept BLS12-479+ curve. Empirical benchmarks confirm that its native 2-isogeny bridge yields a 19.7× speedup in deobfuscation and a 2.4× speedup in obfuscation compared to the standard BLS12-381 baseline, establishing a computationally trivial blueprint for unconditionally DPI-resistant consensus layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrey Chmora (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: