Background: Erosive tooth wear results from repeated exposure to dietary or intrinsic acids and mechanical forces. Purpose: To determine whether fluoride varnish pretreatment enhances the protection provided by a tin- and fluoride-containing toothpaste against erosive-abrasive enamel wear. Methods: In this in vitro study, 52 human enamel specimens from 30 third molars were allocated to four groups (n = 13): fluoride varnish pretreatment followed by tin- and fluoride-containing toothpaste (FV), the same toothpaste without pretreatment (PC), fluoride varnish pretreatment followed by fluoride-free toothpaste (FV-C), and fluoride-free toothpaste without pretreatment (NC). Specimens underwent 10 days of erosive-abrasive cycling. Enamel loss was measured by contact profilometry and analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and model-based simple-effect contrasts. Results: Mean enamel loss (± standard deviation) was 7.34 ± 3.98 μm (FV), 18.80 ± 4.72 μm (PC), 8.64 ± 4.74 μm (FV-C), and 22.58 ± 4.26 μm (NC). Varnish pretreatment (p < 0.001) and toothpaste formulation (p = 0.044) had significant main effects. Their interaction was not statistically significant (p = 0.317). PC had lower enamel loss than NC (p = 0.034). FV and FV-C did not differ significantly (p = 0.459). Conclusion: Fluoride varnish pretreatment reduced enamel loss under these experimental conditions. The tin- and fluoride-containing toothpaste reduced enamel loss relative to the fluoride-free toothpaste without varnish pretreatment. After pretreatment, the difference between toothpaste formulations was not statistically significant. These findings do not establish treatment equivalence or exclude additional benefits under clinical conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: