This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Title: Substrate Logistics: High-Precision Closed-Form Derivation of the Fine-Structure Constant (α⁻¹) and 3D Metric Running Author: Marco Lindenbeck Description: This paper presents a parameter-free derivation of the fine-structure constant (α⁻¹) and its high-energy metric running within the Substrate Logistics discrete physics framework. By modeling physical space as a discrete κ=50 dodecahedral topological network (S³/I^*), α⁻¹ is proven to be a dimensionless topological invariant governed by two scale-invariant hardware mechanisms. First, an exact closed-form algebraic identity for the ground-state inverse fine-structure constant is derived: α⁻¹(0) = 1945 + 601√524 - √10 - 2√2500 ≈ 137.035867902 This bare-metal geodesic path derivation incorporates the 24 oriented face routing channels ($2F=24$) of the unit cell and the exact algebraic Universal Topological Drag Constant (C_δ = √5-2500 ≈ 4.72136 × 10⁻⁴), achieving less than 1 part per million ($0.0000958%$) relative error against the empirical CODATA benchmark. Second, by projecting 3D metric compression across the 3 spatial coordinate channels (1/3) scaled by the 3D Volumetric Vertex Drag tax (80/3C_δ), a purely dimensionless running coupling equation is formulated: α⁻¹(Q) = α⁻¹(0) - S3D · ln( Q²/mₑ² c⁴ ) At the CERN LEP Z-boson mass pole (Q = 91.1876 GeV), this equation derives α⁻¹(mZ) = 128.873, landing squarely within direct electroweak measurement windows (128.89 ± 0.09) and global fits (128.94 ± 0.01) to $99.95%$ precision without requiring virtual particle vacuum polarization loops. Additionally, the manuscript derives the electron mass shell (mₑ), Bohr radius (a₀), and Rydberg constant (R_∞) as deterministic hardware outputs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Lindenbeck (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: