Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two coordination polymers formulated [Fe(pmd)2[Ag(CN)2]2] (pmd = pyrimidine) have been synthesized and characterized. Both polymers, considered to be architectural isomers, display different crystal structures and magnetic properties. Isomer 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group with a = 6.9750(8) angstroms, b = 16.1700(9) angstroms, c = 14.2020(8) angstroms, beta = 97.954(2) degrees, V = 1586.37(14) angstroms3, and Z = 4. The crystal structure of isomer 2 has been studied at 250 and 150 K. At both temperatures, 2 displays the orthorhombic Pccn space group with a = 15.7700(2) [14.8950(2)] angstroms, b = 8.2980(4) [8.1580(4)] angstroms, c = 13.4180(6) [13.3480(5)] angstroms, V = 1755.87(14) [1621.96(10)] angstroms3, and Z = 4 for 250 [150] K. The iron(II) ions define distorted octahedral [FeN6] chromophores in both isomers. The equatorial positions are occupied by four [Ag(CN)2]- bridging ligands, which connect the defining layers of two iron(II) ions. Isomer 1 has two crystallographically distinct [Ag(CN)2]- groups; one is essentially linear, while the other is severely distorted [C(5)-Ag(2)-C(5i)] = 138.8(5) degrees. This fact facilitates the parallel interpenetration of two layers, which in addition show short Ag(1)....Ag(2) interactions (distance Ag(1)....Ag(2) = 2.9972(10) angstroms). Isomer 2 shows only one type of Ag atom, which is slightly bent [C-Ag-C = 161.54(12) degrees], and as a consequence, the layers defined are not interpenetrated. In both cases, the axial positions are occupied by the pmd ligands which interact with the Ag atoms of adjacent layers defining a 3D coordination polymer. Compound 1 is high spin in the whole range of temperatures, while 2 undergoes a cooperative high-spin <--> low-spin effect centered at ca. 184 K with a hysteresis loop ca. 5 K wide. The experimental enthalpy and entropy variations were 11.5 +/- 0.4 kJ mol(-1) and 64 +/- 3 J K(-1) mol(-1). Consistency between the experimental thermodynamic data and the magnetic data was checked in the frame of regular solution theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galet et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: