This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
GC/g of feces for chicken. Moderate correlations were observed between EC with P. aeruginosa, EC O157 and Cryptosporidium parvum, whereas weak correlations were observed between EC and Salmonella spp. and Giardia lamblia, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Campylobacter spp. The prevalence of MAC and P. aeruginosa were low in dog (14.3% each) and moderate (57.2%, MAC; 42.9% P. aeruginosa) in Eastern grey kangaroo fecal samples. Cryptosporidium parvum was detected in one cattle and one human fecal sample, while G. lamblia was detected in one dog, one flying fox, and one pig fecal samples. Among the eight potential pathogens tested, five pathogens were detected in chicken and dog fecal samples. The remaining animal species contained up to three potential pathogens in their feces. The data generated in this study may aid in the calculation of pathogen loads in the environment, and hence to assess the risks from human and animal fecal contamination of source waters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: