Key result
Cardisio AI test shows ~90% negative predictive value for identifying secondary care cardiology referrals.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease disproportionately affects hard-to-reach individuals, and new community-based testing technology may address health inequalities and facilitate care pathways.
Does the Cardisio AI test accurately identify asymptomatic CVD and facilitate appropriate referral in high-risk adults in community settings?
Cohort (n=628)
Yes
Does the Cardisio AI test accurately identify asymptomatic CVD and facilitate appropriate referral in high-risk adults in community settings?
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.831
p-value: p=<0.001
The Cardisio AI test provides an easily administered, near-patient method with high positive and negative predictive values for identifying cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic at-risk community populations.
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality disproportionately affecting hard-to-reach individuals. New technology that enables community testing rather than attending hospital may address health inequalities and facilitate new care pathways. Aim To explore whether the Cardisio test, which interprets three-dimensional vectorcardiography activity using a cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, can identify asymptomatic CVD. Design & setting Prospective cohort study in three settings: general practice, pharmacy, and a community health centre. Recruitment targeted asymptomatic adults aged ≥18 years, with a QRISK3 score ≥10% or CVD risk factors. Method A 10-minute test using five electrodes (four chest, one back). The Cardisio results are classified into red, amber, or green based on the Cardisio test’s perfusion (P), structure (S), and arrhythmia (A) parameters. Pre- and post-test questionnaires provided feedback on participants’ experiences. Results reviewed by a chief investigator ([CI] independent consultant cardiologist) and dealt with according to the study participants’ results and medical profile. Results In total, 628 tests were performed, 51% male ( n = 320), 49% ( n = 308) female, with a mean age of 54 years (18–75 years). In the opinion of the CI, there was a strong association between one or more Cardisio red test results and referral to cardiology clinic being indicated ( P <0.001). The test was understood as easy to perform, with an 87.5% recommendation rate among participants ( n = 492 of the 560). Conclusion This simple, near-patient test afforded high-risk hard-to-reach individuals with access to an acceptable test that can facilitate appropriate referral. The automated test does not rely on interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) readouts and so is more effective at identifying underlying CVD than a traditional 12-lead ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudland et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=628). Cardisio AI test vs. Consultant cardiologist desktop review was evaluated on Agreement between Cardisio test result (red vs green) and consultant cardiologist opinion on the need for secondary care referral (Kappa 0.831, p=<0.001). The Cardisio AI test accurately identified patients requiring cardiology referral with a positive predictive value of 80%, a negative predictive value of 90.4%, and excellent agreement with consultant evaluation (Kappa 0.831).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: