Key result
Epicatechin study on myocardial ischemia-induced cardiac injury is retracted over duplicated image data.
This publication is a retraction notice for a paper that contained overlapping and previously published data panels.
Clinicians and researchers should disregard the retracted epicatechin findings; confirms the necessity of rigorous image verification in preclinical cardiology.
Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that the control GAPDH western blot data featured in Fig. 4A on p. 8305 had already appeared previously in an article in the journal Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry in a different experimental context written by different authors (albeit one of the research institutes was held in common between the papers). In addition, after assessing the data in this paper independently in the Editorial Office, it also came to light that two pairs of data panels featured respectively in Fig. 2A (showing H&E‑stained histological sections) and Fig. 2B (showing the results of TUNEL assays) contained overlapping sections of data where different experimental conditions were reported, suggesting that these data panels were derived from the same original sources. Owing to the fact that the contentious data in the above article had already been published prior to its submission to Molecular Medicine Reports, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. Upon contacting the authors, they accepted the decision to retract the paper. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Molecular Medicine Reports 17: 8300‑8308, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8870].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied Myocardial ischemia-induced cardiac injury. (-)-Epicatechin was evaluated. The paper investigating (-)-Epicatechin in myocardial ischemia-induced cardiac injury was retracted due to previously published and overlapping western blot and histological image data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: