Key result
Systematic review protocol evaluates intraoperative hypotension and haemodynamic strategies in liver resection.
Why the study?
Existing reviews of liver resection have focused on blood loss and transfusion but have not resolved whether directly quantified intraoperative arterial hypotension is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury or myocardial injury, or whether comparative haemodynamic strategies alter these outcomes.
Does intraoperative arterial-hypotension increase, or do comparative pressure- or flow-directed strategies prevent, postoperative acute kidney injury and myocardial injury in adults undergoing partial liver resection?
Systematic Review
Does intraoperative arterial-hypotension increase, or do comparative pressure- or flow-directed strategies prevent, postoperative acute kidney injury and myocardial injury in adults undergoing partial liver resection?
This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of intraoperative hypotension and targeted hemodynamic strategies on postoperative acute kidney injury and myocardial injury following liver resection.
No results from this protocol; leaves open effects of hypotension and hemodynamic strategies on AKI and myocardial injury after liver resection.
Background Liver resection creates a clinical tension between limiting operative bleeding and maintaining organ perfusion. Low central venous pressure, fluid restriction, vascular inflow occlusion and vasoactive treatment can coincide with lower arterial pressure, yet existing reviews have centred on blood loss and transfusion. They have not resolved whether directly quantified intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury or myocardial injury, or whether comparative haemodynamic strategies alter these outcomes. We will address both questions while keeping exposure associations distinct from management effects and kidney outcomes distinct from myocardial outcomes. Methods This prospectively registered review will search four bibliographic databases and two trial registries from inception, supplemented by citation searching and author contact, without language or date restrictions. Eligible studies will include adults undergoing partial liver resection and report a quantified intraoperative arterial-hypotension exposure or a comparative pressure- or flow-directed strategy with acute kidney injury or myocardial injury. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias, with independent handling of review-team-authored studies. Four prespecified synthesis domains will separate exposure from management evidence and kidney from myocardial outcomes. Compatible estimates will undergo random-effects meta-analysis; otherwise, structured synthesis without meta-analysis will be used. Heterogeneity, missing evidence and certainty will be assessed. This design aims to distinguish prognostic association from evidence about modifiable haemodynamic management. Registration PROSPERO CRD420261476933 ; Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3GCY2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Partial liver resection. Intraoperative arterial hypotension or comparative haemodynamic strategy vs. Lower hypotension burden, usual care, or another haemodynamic target was evaluated on Postoperative acute kidney injury within 7 days and postoperative myocardial injury within 30 days. Intraoperative hypotension and comparative haemodynamic strategies during liver resection are the subjects of this planned systematic review and meta-analysis protocol, which currently reports no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: