Key result
Stroke prediction models show modest accuracy in women with AF, yielding c-statistics around ~0.60.
Why the study?
External validation of patient-level prediction models across multiple heterogeneous observational healthcare datasets is necessary to assess model transportability but is often slow and limited in scale.
Observational
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing models should not yet inform stroke risk decisions in women with AF; leaves open the need for improved sex-specific prognostic tools.
BACKGROUND: To demonstrate how the Observational Healthcare Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI) collaborative network and standardization can be utilized to scale-up external validation of patient-level prediction models by enabling validation across a large number of heterogeneous observational healthcare datasets. METHODS: VASC, Q-Stroke and Framingham) that predict future risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation were replicated using the OHDSI frameworks. A network study was run that enabled the five models to be externally validated across nine observational healthcare datasets spanning three countries and five independent sites. RESULTS: The five existing models were able to be integrated into the OHDSI framework for patient-level prediction and they obtained mean c-statistics ranging between 0.57-0.63 across the 6 databases with sufficient data to predict stroke within 1 year of initial atrial fibrillation diagnosis for females with atrial fibrillation. This was comparable with existing validation studies. The validation network study was run across nine datasets within 60 days once the models were replicated. An R package for the study was published at https://github.com/OHDSI/StudyProtocolSandbox/tree/master/ExistingStrokeRiskExternalValidation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the ability to scale up external validation of patient-level prediction models using a collaboration of researchers and a data standardization that enable models to be readily shared across data sites. External validation is necessary to understand the transportability or reproducibility of a prediction model, but without collaborative approaches it can take three or more years for a model to be validated by one independent researcher. In this paper we show it is possible to both scale-up and speed-up external validation by showing how validation can be done across multiple databases in less than 2 months. We recommend that researchers developing new prediction models use the OHDSI network to externally validate their models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reps et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation. Stroke prediction models (ATRIA, CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, Framingham, Q-Stroke) was evaluated on Predicting stroke within 1 year of initial atrial fibrillation diagnosis (discriminative ability) (mean c-statistics 0.57-0.63). Five existing prognostic models for predicting stroke in female patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated modest performance upon external validation, obtaining mean c-statistics ranging between 0.57 and 0.63.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: