Key result
High CV risk-factor burden linked to ~3.2-fold higher odds of physical inactivity.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk factors often cluster in adults, and the dose-response relationship between cumulative risk-factor burden and physical inactivity in Southeastern Europe was unclear.
Does a higher cumulative cardiovascular risk factor burden associate with increased physical inactivity in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=244)
Yes
Does a higher cumulative cardiovascular risk factor burden associate with increased physical inactivity in adults?
Physical inactivity increases in a dose-response manner with the accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk assessment to target lifestyle interventions.
High-burden adults may merit activity screening; leaves open causality and generalizability pending prospective studies.
Background: Cardiovascular risk factors rarely occur alone, and many adults in Southeastern Europe live with several of them. This study aimed to assess the dose-response association between cumulative cardiovascular risk-factor burden and physical inactivity among adults in Tirana, Albania. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the first 250 consecutive adults were interviewed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. Of these, 244 had complete data and were included in the analysis. Participants accumulating fewer than 600 metabolic equivalent (MET)-minutes per week were classified as inactive. Current smoking, overweight or obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia were combined into a score (0–5), categorised as low (0–1), moderate (2–3) or high (≥4) burden. The association with inactivity was analysed using logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results: In total, 32.8% of participants were inactive and 58.2% had two or more risk factors. Inactivity rose stepwise across burden groups (24.5%, 36.7% and 45.5%; p for trend = .013). Compared with the low-burden group, the adjusted odds of inactivity were about twice as high in the moderate-burden group (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–4.31) and three times as high in the high-burden group (OR = 3.25; 95% CI 1.25–8.44), and each additional risk factor was associated with 31% higher odds. Conclusion: In our study, physical inactivity became more frequent as cardiovascular risk factors accumulated. Assessing risk factors jointly may help identify adults who most need support to become active.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldo Shpuza (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors and physical inactivity (n=244). High cumulative cardiovascular risk-factor burden (≥4 factors) vs. Low risk-factor burden (0-1 factors) was evaluated on Physical inactivity (<600 MET-minutes per week) (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.25-8.44, p=0.015). High cumulative cardiovascular risk-factor burden (≥4 factors) tripled the adjusted odds of physical inactivity (OR 3.25) compared with low burden (0-1 factors) among adults in Albania.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: