Why the study?
Routine anthropometric and lipid markers capture only part of cardiometabolic risk, motivating comparison of novel waist-adiposity–glycolipid indices for long-term hypertension prediction.
Do novel waist-adiposity-glycolipid composite indices (TyG-WAI, MCMI-WAI, WyG-WAI) independently predict long-term risk of new-onset hypertension compared to traditional indices in normotensive adults?
Cohort (n=15,422)
Do novel waist-adiposity-glycolipid composite indices (TyG-WAI, MCMI-WAI, WyG-WAI) independently predict long-term risk of new-onset hypertension compared to traditional indices in normotensive adults?
Novel waist-adiposity-integrated indices, specifically TyG-WAI and MCMI-WAI, are robust and independent predictors of long-term incident hypertension and may serve as valuable markers for cardiometabolic risk stratification.
TyG-WAI may support risk stratification in normotensive adults; extends composite indices for prediction but leaves open prospective validation.
Background Glycolipid dysregulation is linked to vascular damage and hypertension, but routine anthropometric and lipid markers capture only part of cardiometabolic risk. We constructed a novel waist-adiposity index (WAI) that integrates two independent dimensions of central obesity(absolute WHtR and relative WC/BMI) and compared four glycolipid composite indices for long-term hypertension prediction. Methods We analyzed 15,422 adults from the NAGALA community cohort (recruited 1994–2016, mean follow-up 6.05 years). Three indices incorporated WAI (TyG-WAI, MCMI-WAI, WyG-WAI); CMI served as a non-WAI comparator. We performed comprehensive internal validation of WAI across eight domains: known-groups validity, convergent/discriminant validity, time-dependent AUC, incremental predictive value (ΔC-index), restricted cubic spline dose-response, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and measurement-error propagation. All indices were z-score standardized. Results During follow-up, 780 participants developed hypertension. Three indices (CMI, MCMI-WAI, TyG-WAI) were independently associated with incident hypertension in fully adjusted Cox models (all p < 0.05); WyG-WAI was not. WAI internal validation confirmed: known-groups validity (MetS p < 0.001, overweight p < 0.001), convergent validity (r with WC = 0.600, BMI = 0.357), discriminant validity (r with WHtR = 0.789 > r with BMI = 0.357), 13-year AUC = 0.733 (95% CI 0.703–0.763), a statistically significant likelihood-ratio test for incremental value (p = 0.008) with negligible absolute change in C-index (ΔC-index = −0.00021), linear dose–response (P nonlinear = 0.280), exploratory associations in women (HR = 1.216, p = 0.008) and lean adults (HR = 1.186, p = 0.004), and robustness across four exclusion criteria plus measurement-error propagation (CV = 2.26% for WC ±1 cm error). Conclusions Three of four indices were independently associated with long-term hypertension risk, with distinct nonlinear patterns. WAI demonstrated robust internal validity across eight domains and may serve as a candidate risk-stratification marker. Exploratory subgroup findings in women and lean adults require confirmation in independent cohorts. External validation in independent cohorts is required before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (Risk) (n=15,422). TyG-WAI (triglyceride-glucose waist adiposity index) vs. Lower TyG-WAI levels was evaluated on Incident hypertension (HR 1.183, 95% CI 1.067-1.312, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: