Key result
Male sex linked to ~4-fold higher risk of SCD or VF in Brugada syndrome.
Why the study?
Gender differences in clinical manifestations and prognosis of Brugada syndrome have not been specifically characterized in a large patient population.
Does prognosis and clinical manifestation of Brugada syndrome differ between men and women?
Cohort (n=384)
Does prognosis and clinical manifestation of Brugada syndrome differ between men and women?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.6% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=0.003
Men with Brugada syndrome present with a higher-risk clinical profile and have a significantly worse prognosis regarding sudden cardiac death or ventricular fibrillation compared to women.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess differences in phenotype and prognosis between men and women in a large population of patients with Brugada syndrome. BACKGROUND: A male predominance has been reported in the Brugada syndrome. No specific data are available, however, concerning gender differences in the clinical manifestations and their role in prognosis. METHODS: Patients with Brugada syndrome were prospectively included in the study. Data on baseline characteristics, electrocardiogram parameters before and after pharmacological test, and events in follow-up were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: Among 384 patients, 272 (70.8%) were men and 112 (29.2%) women. At inclusion, men had experienced syncope more frequently (18%) or aborted sudden cardiac death (6%) than women (14% and 1%, respectively, p = 0.04). Men also had greater rates of spontaneous type-1 electrocardiogram, greater ST-segment elevation, and greater inducibility of ventricular fibrillation (p < 0.001 for all). Conversely, conduction parameters and corrected QT intervals significantly increased more in women in response to sodium blockers (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001, respectively). During a mean follow-up of 58 +/- 48 months, sudden cardiac death or documented ventricular fibrillation occurred in 31 men (11.6%) and 3 women (2.8%; p = 0.003). The presence of previous symptoms was the most important predictor for cardiac events in men, whereas a longer PR interval was identified among those women with a greater risk in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Men with Brugada syndrome present with a greater risk clinical profile than women and have a worse prognosis. Although classical risk factors identify male patients with worse outcome, conduction disturbances could be a marker of risk in the female population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benito et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Brugada syndrome (n=384). Male gender vs. Female gender was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death or documented ventricular fibrillation (p=0.003). Men with Brugada syndrome had a significantly higher rate of sudden cardiac death or documented ventricular fibrillation during follow-up compared to women (11.6% vs 2.8%, p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: